"art is never necessary...

... it is merely indispensable."

New York Times art critic Michael Kimmelman writes about The Gates. Once upon a time, and that time is now.

Comments

  1. Anonymous13 February 2005 at 11:12

    eres un poco zorra, no?
    zorra = fox pero en hembra

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous13 February 2005 at 11:12

    eres un poco zorra, no?
    zorra = fox pero en hembra

    ReplyDelete
  3. laura k13 February 2005 at 11:43

    Hmm... zorra? A vixen? Female fox? Is this a good thing or should I be offended?

    Or maybe it's spam...

    ReplyDelete
  4. laura k13 February 2005 at 11:43

    Hmm... zorra? A vixen? Female fox? Is this a good thing or should I be offended?

    Or maybe it's spam...

    ReplyDelete
  5. Steve19 February 2005 at 05:13

    I actually like the concept of postmodern art more than I like postmodern art itself...I suppose the fact that I deemed it necessary to comment is validation in and of itself.

    ReplyDelete
  6. laura k19 February 2005 at 07:06

    Steve, you know I often say the exact same thing? We'll go to some free, site-specific, public art event, and I love the whole idea of it. But about the installation itself, I often feel, eh, just there. But generally my expectations are not high, and I still enjoy it. Obviously I'm expecting to feel more strongly about The Gates. I've heard that the photos cannot convey the effect it has in person.

    ReplyDelete
  7. laura k19 February 2005 at 07:06

    Steve, you know I often say the exact same thing? We'll go to some free, site-specific, public art event, and I love the whole idea of it. But about the installation itself, I often feel, eh, just there. But generally my expectations are not high, and I still enjoy it. Obviously I'm expecting to feel more strongly about The Gates. I've heard that the photos cannot convey the effect it has in person.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

not so fast

Not everyone thinks the Conservative government is a lock. Canada's opposition Conservative Party, which is set to bring down the minority Liberal government later this week, was hit by a new opinion poll on Monday that showed it was trailing in the country's most vote-rich region. The Leger Marketing poll for the Sun chain of newspapers put support for the Liberals in the powerful central province of Ontario at 43 percent compared with 31 percent for the Conservatives. Ontario, a Liberal stronghold at the federal level for the past 12 years, accounts for 106 of the 308 seats in House of Commons, and no party can hope to form a government without doing well there. . . . Prime Minister Paul Martin's Liberals have been badly hurt by a corruption scandal and Conservative leader Stephen Harper says the government must be defeated as soon as possible. The Leger figures, however, suggest there is no guarantee Harper can end 12 years of Liberal rule. Thanks, ALPF! I must say, I...
Read more

dipstick

So there won't be an election yet. Talk about a squeaker . Feel free to tell us how you feel about this, unless it's all been said already, then feel free not to. ALPF mustered his courage and sent more links, so I have some good commentary to post. I found this Macleans story on the Conservative party's reaction to Stronach's decision - and public reaction to that reaction - very interesting. Canadians seem almost universally turned off by the name-calling and sexist slurs. On the other hand, when a certain governor made his "girly men" pronouncement, his constituency howled with glee. (Which is not to say the rest of us weren't appalled.) The Macleans article also notes that not all the sexism came from politicians: Some of the most sexist characterizations of Stronach didn't come from her political adversaries, but from media. Montreal's La Presse newspaper ran a cartoon of Martin leaning out his car window to solicit a street-walking Stronach...
Read more