blood for oil

Independent journalist Greg Palast writes:
The Bush administration made plans for war and for Iraq's oil before the 9/11 attacks, sparking a policy battle between neo-cons and Big Oil, BBC's Newsnight has revealed.

Two years ago today - when President George Bush announced US, British and Allied forces would begin to bomb Baghdad - protestors claimed the US had a secret plan for Iraq's oil once Saddam had been conquered.

In fact there were two conflicting plans, setting off a hidden policy war between neo-conservatives at the Pentagon, on one side, versus a combination of "Big Oil" executives and US State Department "pragmatists."

"Big Oil" appears to have won. The latest plan, obtained by Newsnight from the US State Department was, we learned, drafted with the help of American oil industry consultants.

Insiders told Newsnight that planning began "within weeks" of Bush's first taking office in 2001, long before the September 11th attack on the US. [emphasis mine]
Palast has made a film about the plan, based on a joint investigation by BBC Newsnight and Harper's Magazine. You can watch it online, up to 7 p.m. EST today: go here.

The full story is in the current issue of Harper's Magazine. I don't believe you can read it online, you have to buy the magazine. So go do that.

Comments

  1. Expat18 March 2005 at 16:28

    Good luck with the move to Canada and thanks for passing my link onto your NYC Canuck friends! :o)

    I enjoy reading your blog!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Expat18 March 2005 at 16:28

    Good luck with the move to Canada and thanks for passing my link onto your NYC Canuck friends! :o)

    I enjoy reading your blog!

    ReplyDelete
  3. laura k18 March 2005 at 20:02

    Thanks so much! Where are you?

    ReplyDelete
  4. allan19 March 2005 at 06:13

    Didn't Paul O'Neill get into this in his book -- how they were obsessed with Iraq from January 21 ... and actually before being installed?

    Cheney had maps created with details for distribution of oil fields in post-war Iraq -- and this was quite a bit before 9/11.

    These documents are now out in the public.

    ReplyDelete
  5. allan19 March 2005 at 06:13

    Didn't Paul O'Neill get into this in his book -- how they were obsessed with Iraq from January 21 ... and actually before being installed?

    Cheney had maps created with details for distribution of oil fields in post-war Iraq -- and this was quite a bit before 9/11.

    These documents are now out in the public.

    ReplyDelete
  6. laura k19 March 2005 at 06:17

    Yes, I believe O'Neill did write and speak about this. Of course he was dismissed as a disgruntled employee. This is further vindication, as if more were needed.

    ReplyDelete
  7. laura k19 March 2005 at 06:17

    Yes, I believe O'Neill did write and speak about this. Of course he was dismissed as a disgruntled employee. This is further vindication, as if more were needed.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

not so fast

Not everyone thinks the Conservative government is a lock. Canada's opposition Conservative Party, which is set to bring down the minority Liberal government later this week, was hit by a new opinion poll on Monday that showed it was trailing in the country's most vote-rich region. The Leger Marketing poll for the Sun chain of newspapers put support for the Liberals in the powerful central province of Ontario at 43 percent compared with 31 percent for the Conservatives. Ontario, a Liberal stronghold at the federal level for the past 12 years, accounts for 106 of the 308 seats in House of Commons, and no party can hope to form a government without doing well there. . . . Prime Minister Paul Martin's Liberals have been badly hurt by a corruption scandal and Conservative leader Stephen Harper says the government must be defeated as soon as possible. The Leger figures, however, suggest there is no guarantee Harper can end 12 years of Liberal rule. Thanks, ALPF! I must say, I...
Read more

dipstick

So there won't be an election yet. Talk about a squeaker . Feel free to tell us how you feel about this, unless it's all been said already, then feel free not to. ALPF mustered his courage and sent more links, so I have some good commentary to post. I found this Macleans story on the Conservative party's reaction to Stronach's decision - and public reaction to that reaction - very interesting. Canadians seem almost universally turned off by the name-calling and sexist slurs. On the other hand, when a certain governor made his "girly men" pronouncement, his constituency howled with glee. (Which is not to say the rest of us weren't appalled.) The Macleans article also notes that not all the sexism came from politicians: Some of the most sexist characterizations of Stronach didn't come from her political adversaries, but from media. Montreal's La Presse newspaper ran a cartoon of Martin leaning out his car window to solicit a street-walking Stronach...
Read more