i'm not a democrat, either

I've been getting comments and email from right-wingers who mistakenly assume I am leaving the country because Bush was elected. Allow me to clarify.



We made our decision to emigrate in July 2003, and filed our applications in early 2004. The applications cost more than $2,500 and entailed quite a lot of work. We are not wealthy people who can drop thousands of dollars on a "what-if". In other words, we were planning on leaving no matter who was elected.



I wanted Bush to lose more than I've wanted anything in a recent memory. It was incredibly important to me to defeat his administration and I'm heartbroken that it didn't happen. (And even more horrified that he probably didn't actually win the election!!)



I voted for Kerry, but I'm not a Democrat. They are clearly the better choice, but they are also, in my opinion, clearly part of the problem.



I'm not your garden-variety liberal. I am what's known as a progressive. My politics fall several steps to the left of most Democrats. (Unless the Democrat is Joe Lieberman, then they fall several miles to the left.)



The system is bankrupt. The entrenched two-party system, the corporate stranglehold, the multi-million dollar campaigns, the lobbying, the antiquated electoral college and the corporate-controlled media - they all conspire to kill democracy. Add to that the ascendancy of the religious right - the war on women, gay people, the working class, the environment, education, science... it's a long list. I want out.



Please stop writing to tell me how John Kerry is not worth abandoning my country for. This hasn't felt like my country for a long time.

Comments

  1. laura k10 November 2004 at 08:19

    Perhaps I was unclear. Please do not post here again. Your comments will always be deleted. Thank you.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous10 November 2004 at 09:15

    I agree that our system in America is a disaster.

    How has it been corrupted so much that you have to be a multi millionaire to even run for the Senate let alone the White House?

    It really makes little people like me feel utterly powerless.

    ReplyDelete
  3. laura k10 November 2004 at 09:21

    The ruling class of this country has always been the wealthy elite, going all the way back to George Washington.

    You're not powerless. People's movements have changed the world - ended slavery and apartheid, dismantled Jim Crow, brought the US universal suffrage. There are dozens of examples all around us. Now it's easier to organize than ever, because of the internet.

    Joining together with others, you can help change the country and the world.

    ReplyDelete
  4. robert d10 November 2004 at 11:51

    Hope you are having a wonderful day.

    Snapping out,

    D

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous7 January 2005 at 11:50

    I think I had been unconsciously plotting my escape from the "land of the free" for a long time. I remember distinctly how uncomfortable I felt, at age 5, in the first grade, at school in a suburb of Columbus, Ohio, about being trained in to chant the Pledge of Allegiance. What does this mean? I thought. I don't believe in God. I remember how stern our teacher was, the instructions to put RIGHT HAND OVER HEART. At that point, I still wasn't entirely certain which was left and which was right.

    I know now. I am left. And I left.

    --Mollie

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

not so fast

Not everyone thinks the Conservative government is a lock. Canada's opposition Conservative Party, which is set to bring down the minority Liberal government later this week, was hit by a new opinion poll on Monday that showed it was trailing in the country's most vote-rich region. The Leger Marketing poll for the Sun chain of newspapers put support for the Liberals in the powerful central province of Ontario at 43 percent compared with 31 percent for the Conservatives. Ontario, a Liberal stronghold at the federal level for the past 12 years, accounts for 106 of the 308 seats in House of Commons, and no party can hope to form a government without doing well there. . . . Prime Minister Paul Martin's Liberals have been badly hurt by a corruption scandal and Conservative leader Stephen Harper says the government must be defeated as soon as possible. The Leger figures, however, suggest there is no guarantee Harper can end 12 years of Liberal rule. Thanks, ALPF! I must say, I...
Read more

dipstick

So there won't be an election yet. Talk about a squeaker . Feel free to tell us how you feel about this, unless it's all been said already, then feel free not to. ALPF mustered his courage and sent more links, so I have some good commentary to post. I found this Macleans story on the Conservative party's reaction to Stronach's decision - and public reaction to that reaction - very interesting. Canadians seem almost universally turned off by the name-calling and sexist slurs. On the other hand, when a certain governor made his "girly men" pronouncement, his constituency howled with glee. (Which is not to say the rest of us weren't appalled.) The Macleans article also notes that not all the sexism came from politicians: Some of the most sexist characterizations of Stronach didn't come from her political adversaries, but from media. Montreal's La Presse newspaper ran a cartoon of Martin leaning out his car window to solicit a street-walking Stronach...
Read more