why i prefer canada, reason number 35,264

Today's poll in the Toronto Globe And Mail:
Do you feel that Canada should participate in the U.S. ballistic missile defence program?

Yes 5306 votes (20%)

No 21347 votes (80%)
No matter that it's an unscientific survey. If you can show me a poll in any mainstream American media that shows 80% of respondents against anything military, I'll stay.

Comments

  1. Anonymous3 December 2004 at 10:35

    Unfortunately it seems Bush is intent on railroading us into acceptance of missle defence.

    I think the PM's tactic is to stall until 2008 and hope that Bush's successor makes it a moot point. He might commission some studies or something to buy time.

    ReplyDelete
  2. laura k3 December 2004 at 10:52

    Anon (Kyle?) : How can Bush force Canada to do that? What is he using as leverage - trade considerations?

    Miss K: I did see The Daily Show last night - Stewart was great, as always. But even so, missile defense (a/k/a Star Wars) is a pretty easy target.

    Thank you for the welcome! Where do you live?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous3 December 2004 at 12:27

    Trade considerations. Things like reopening the border to Canadian beef, etc.

    So, I predict Martin will try to seem like he's open to the idea to please Bush, without actually doing anything at all. Politics is politcs, after all.

    --Kyle

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous3 December 2004 at 12:33

    After all, sometimes it's easier to smile and nod when dealing with someone who's pig-headed on an issue. Arguing is futile, but seeming to agree and then doing nothing about it is easy.

    ReplyDelete
  5. laura k3 December 2004 at 12:33

    Right. Makes sense. I'm sure very few Canadians would want to see it actually happen.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

not so fast

Not everyone thinks the Conservative government is a lock. Canada's opposition Conservative Party, which is set to bring down the minority Liberal government later this week, was hit by a new opinion poll on Monday that showed it was trailing in the country's most vote-rich region. The Leger Marketing poll for the Sun chain of newspapers put support for the Liberals in the powerful central province of Ontario at 43 percent compared with 31 percent for the Conservatives. Ontario, a Liberal stronghold at the federal level for the past 12 years, accounts for 106 of the 308 seats in House of Commons, and no party can hope to form a government without doing well there. . . . Prime Minister Paul Martin's Liberals have been badly hurt by a corruption scandal and Conservative leader Stephen Harper says the government must be defeated as soon as possible. The Leger figures, however, suggest there is no guarantee Harper can end 12 years of Liberal rule. Thanks, ALPF! I must say, I...
Read more

dipstick

So there won't be an election yet. Talk about a squeaker . Feel free to tell us how you feel about this, unless it's all been said already, then feel free not to. ALPF mustered his courage and sent more links, so I have some good commentary to post. I found this Macleans story on the Conservative party's reaction to Stronach's decision - and public reaction to that reaction - very interesting. Canadians seem almost universally turned off by the name-calling and sexist slurs. On the other hand, when a certain governor made his "girly men" pronouncement, his constituency howled with glee. (Which is not to say the rest of us weren't appalled.) The Macleans article also notes that not all the sexism came from politicians: Some of the most sexist characterizations of Stronach didn't come from her political adversaries, but from media. Montreal's La Presse newspaper ran a cartoon of Martin leaning out his car window to solicit a street-walking Stronach...
Read more